Classical peer review: an empty gun
Open Access
- 20 December 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Breast Cancer Research
- Vol. 12 (S4), S13
- https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2742
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Current Publication Practices May Distort SciencePLoS Medicine, 2008
- What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2008
- Peer review for improving the quality of grant applicationsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2007
- Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studiesEmergencias, 2007
- Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journalsJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2006
- Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studiesPublished by Wiley ,2006
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2005
- Peer review for improving the quality of grant applicationsPublished by Wiley ,2003
- RETRACTED: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in childrenThe Lancet, 1998
- Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted againBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982