Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications
- 20 January 2003
- reference entry
- research article
- Published by Wiley
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nepotism and sexism in peer-reviewNature, 1997
- Rethinking Grant Peer ReviewScience, 1997
- Research Impact AssessmentInvestigative Radiology, 1994
- The role and influence of the us national science foundation's program officers in reviewing and awarding grantsHigher Education, 1994
- Grants Peer Review in Theory and PracticeEvaluation Review, 1994
- Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer reviewBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1991
- The Predictive Ability of Peer Review of Grant Proposals: The Case of Ecology and the US National Science FoundationSocial Studies of Science, 1991
- First Comprehensive Survey of NSF Applicants Focuses on Their Concerns About Proposal ReviewScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1989
- Research Policy: Problems with peer review and alternativesBMJ, 1988
- Funding Science: The Real Defects of Peer Review and An Alternative To ItScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1985