Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
Open Access
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
- Vol. 99 (4), 178-182
- https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2004
- Effects of Editorial Peer ReviewJAMA, 2002
- Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trialBMJ, 1999
- Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998
- Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their ReportsJAMA, 1998
- Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer ReviewJAMA, 1998
- Nepotism and sexism in peer-reviewNature, 1997
- Pardonable revisions and protocol reviewsThe Lancet, 1997
- The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial.1990
- The critical attitude in medicine: the need for a new ethics.BMJ, 1983