Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies
- 25 January 2006
- reference entry
- research article
- Published by Wiley
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efecto de la revisión estadística en la calidad de los manuscritos publicados en MEDICINA CLÍNICA: estudio aleatorizadoMedicina Clinica, 2003
- Incidence and Nature of Unblinding by Authors: Our Experience at Two Radiology Journals with Double-Blinded Peer Review PoliciesAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2002
- Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of ReviewsJAMA, 2002
- What are the benefits of editorials and non-systematic reviews?BMJ, 1999
- The Medical Journal of Australia internet peer-review studyThe Lancet, 1998
- Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their ReportsJAMA, 1998
- Are road safety evaluation studies published in peer reviewed journals more valid than similar studies not published in peer reviewed journals?Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1998
- An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1993
- Interrater Reliability of 1987–1991Research Quarterly for Exercise and SportReviewsResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1992
- Collaboration and the Quality of ResearchSocial Studies of Science, 1980