The impact of the CONSORT statement on reporting of randomized clinical trials in psychiatry
- 31 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Vol. 30 (2), 116-122
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2008.11.004
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesBMJ, 2007
- Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statementJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007
- Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort studyBMJ, 2005
- CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2004
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 1998
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statementJAMA, 1996
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995