Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 18 October 2007
- Vol. 335 (7624), 806-808
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.ad
Abstract
Poor reporting of research hampers assessment and makes it less useful. An international group of methodologists, researchers, and journal editors sets out guidelines to improve reports of observational studiesThis publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Bias in psychiatric case–control studiesThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2007
- Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2006
- Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studiesCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2006
- A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiologyNature Genetics, 2006
- Suggestions for Improving the Reporting of Clinical Research: The Role of NarrativeAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practiceBMJ, 2004
- CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2004
- Assessing the quality of researchBMJ, 2004
- Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trialsBMJ, 2001