Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
- 29 February 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Controlled Clinical Trials
- Vol. 17 (1), 1-12
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklistsControlled Clinical Trials, 1995
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- Peer ReviewJAMA, 1994
- Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic TestsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1994
- Agreement among reviewers of review articlesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Validation of an index of the quality of review articlesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer ReviewJAMA, 1990
- Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.American Journal of Public Health, 1984
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin, 1979