Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement
- 31 March 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 60 (3), 241-249
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.016
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating psychological treatment effects from a randomised controlled trial with both non-compliance and loss to follow-upThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2003
- When can a clinical trial be called ‘randomized’?Vaccine, 2003
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statementJAMA, 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1995
- Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trialsJAMA, 1994
- Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal EditorsJAMA, 1993
- Reporting on Methods in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Reforms as experiments.American Psychologist, 1969