Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance
Open Access
- 10 May 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 66 (12), 1182-1186
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2011-200375
Abstract
Natural experimental studies are often recommended as a way of understanding the health impact of policies and other large scale interventions. Although they have certain advantages over planned experiments, and may be the only option when it is impossible to manipulate exposure to the intervention, natural experimental studies are more susceptible to bias. This paper introduces new guidance from the Medical Research Council to help researchers and users, funders and publishers of research evidence make the best use of natural experimental approaches to evaluating population health interventions. The guidance emphasises that natural experiments can provide convincing evidence of impact even when effects are small or take time to appear. However, a good understanding is needed of the process determining exposure to the intervention, and careful choice and combination of methods, testing of assumptions and transparent reporting is vital. More could be learnt from natural experiments in future as experience of promising but lesser used methods accumulates.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Instrumental variable methods in comparative safety and effectiveness researchPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2010
- An evaluation of the impact of a large reduction in alcohol prices on alcohol-related and all-cause mortality: time series analysis of a population-based natural experimentInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- Changes in Alcohol-Related Mortality and its Socioeconomic Differences After a Large Reduction in Alcohol Prices: A Natural Experiment Based on Register DataAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Alternatives to the Randomized Controlled TrialAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2008
- Bias Modelling in Evidence SynthesisJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2008
- The population impact on incidence of suicide and non-fatal self harm of regulatory action against the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in under 18s in the United Kingdom: ecological studyBMJ, 2008
- Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesBMJ, 2007
- The impact of pesticide regulations on suicide in Sri LankaInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- Analysis of Observational Studies in the Presence of Treatment Selection BiasJAMA, 2007