Instrumental variable methods in comparative safety and effectiveness research
- 9 June 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Vol. 19 (6), 537-554
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1908
Abstract
Instrumental variable (IV) methods have been proposed as a potential approach to the common problem of uncontrolled confounding in comparative studies of medical interventions, but IV methods are unfamiliar to many researchers. The goal of this article is to provide a non‐technical, practical introduction to IV methods for comparative safety and effectiveness research. We outline the principles and basic assumptions necessary for valid IV estimation, discuss how to interpret the results of an IV study, provide a review of instruments that have been used in comparative effectiveness research, and suggest some minimal reporting standards for an IV analysis. Finally, we offer our perspective of the role of IV estimation vis‐à‐vis more traditional approaches based on statistical modeling of the exposure or outcome. We anticipate that IV methods will be often underpowered for drug safety studies of very rare outcomes, but may be potentially useful in studies of intended effects where uncontrolled confounding may be substantial. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analytic bounds on causal risk differences in directed acyclic graphs involving three observed binary variablesJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2009
- Greater Epoetin alfa (EPO) doses and short‐term mortality risk among hemodialysis patients with hemoglobin levels less than 11 g/dLPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2009
- Instrumental variables II: instrumental variable application—in 25 variations, the physician prescribing preference generally was strong and reduced covariate imbalanceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Effect of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy on Incident AIDS Using Calendar Period as an Instrumental VariableAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- Instantaneous preference was a stronger instrumental variable than 3- and 6-month prescribing preference for NSAIDsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Analysis of Observational Studies in the Presence of Treatment Selection BiasJAMA, 2007
- Effect of Dialysis Center Profit‐Status on Patient Survival: A Comparison of Risk‐Adjustment and Instrumental Variable ApproachesHealth Services Research, 2006
- Evaluating Short-Term Drug Effects Using a Physician-Specific Prescribing Preference as an Instrumental VariableEpidemiology, 2006
- Variable Selection for Propensity Score ModelsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- Two-Stage Least Squares Estimation of Average Causal Effects in Models with Variable Treatment IntensityJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995