Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study
- 22 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Online Information Review
- Vol. 32 (1), 8-21
- https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810865958
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to provide the scientific community with some quantitative data of relevance to the evaluation of two major citation databases. In addition, various aspects of the methodology of database coverage comparisons are discussed.Design/methodology/approach: Calculations of the overlaps between the journal lists of Web of Science and Scopus and some other major scientific databases are presented.Findings: The results provide some measures of the overall title coverage as well as the amount of unique material in the sources studied.Research limitations/implications: The journal title overlap calculations are based on journal lists provided by the database producers rather than searches in the databases themselves. Any inaccuracies in the lists may be reflected in the results. Also, the lists do not provide any information about the depth and consistency of the coverage. The nature of possible error sources is discussed.Originality/value: The methodology chosen allows comparatively quick comparisons between the contents of databases. This makes it suitable for analysis of trends in database coverage.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Some measures for comparing citation databasesJournal of Informetrics, 2007
- Deflated, inflated and phantom citation countsOnline Information Review, 2006
- The Depth and Breadth of Google Scholar: An Empirical Studyportal: Libraries and the Academy, 2006
- An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication EnvironmentD-Lib Magazine, 2005
- The three worlds of health informationJournal of Information Science, 2002
- The Impact Factor: Time for ChangeAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2001
- Analyzing the journal coverage of abstracting/indexing databases at variable aggregate and analytic levelsLibrary & Information Science Research, 1998
- Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating researchBMJ, 1997
- The Public Dissemination of Medical Research: Problems and SolutionsJournal of Health Communication, 1997
- On generalising scientometric journal mapping beyond ISI's journal and citation databasesScientometrics, 1995