The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2010
- journal article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Marketing Science
- Vol. 29 (3), 393-421
- https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0508
Abstract
The mixed or heterogeneous multinomial logit (MIXL) model has become popular in a number of fields, especially marketing, health economics, and industrial organization. In most applications of the model, the vector of consumer utility weights on product attributes is assumed to have a multivariate normal (MVN) distribution in the population. Thus, some consumers care more about some attributes than others, and the IIA property of multinomial logit (MNL) is avoided (i.e., segments of consumers will tend to switch among the subset of brands that possess their most valued attributes). The MIXL model is also appealing because it is relatively easy to estimate. Recently, however, some researchers have argued that the MVN is a poor choice for modelling taste heterogeneity. They argue that much of the heterogeneity in attribute weights is accounted for by a pure scale effect (i.e., across consumers, all attribute weights are scaled up or down in tandem). This implies that choice behaviour is simply more random for some consumers than others (i.e., holding attribute coefficients fixed, the scale of their error term is greater). This leads to a “scale heterogeneity” MNL model (S-MNL). Here, we develop a generalized multinomial logit model (G-MNL) that nests S-MNL and MIXL. By estimating the S-MNL, MIXL, and G-MNL models on 10 data sets, we provide evidence on their relative performance. We find that models that account for scale heterogeneity (i.e., G-MNL or S-MNL) are preferred to MIXL by the Bayes and consistent Akaike information criteria in all 10 data sets. Accounting for scale heterogeneity enables one to account for “extreme” consumers who exhibit nearly lexicographic preferences, as well as consumers who exhibit very “random” behaviour (in a sense we formalize below).Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference informationJournal of Choice Modelling, 2008
- Nonparametric Regression Density Estimation Using Smoothly Varying Normal MixturesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- What influences participation in genetic carrier testing?: Results from a discrete choice experimentJournal of Health Economics, 2006
- Uncovering the Distribution of Motorists' Preferences for Travel Time and ReliabilityEconometrica, 2005
- Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer ChoiceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2001
- Mixed MNL models for discrete responseJournal of Applied Econometrics, 2000
- Marketing models of consumer heterogeneityJournal of Econometrics, 1998
- A model of health plan choice:: Inferring preferences and perceptions from a combination of revealed preference and attitudinal dataJournal of Econometrics, 1998
- Modeling Heterogeneity and State Dependence in Consumer Choice BehaviorJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1997
- A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 1927