What influences participation in genetic carrier testing?: Results from a discrete choice experiment
- 31 May 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Health Economics
- Vol. 25 (3), 520-537
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.09.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic knowledge and family relationships: two case studiesHealth & Social Care in the Community, 2007
- Women and health care professionals' preferences for Down's Syndrome screening tests: a conjoint analysis studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004
- Hypothesis testing with a restricted parameter spaceJournal of Econometrics, 1998
- Using Willingness To Pay To Value Close Substitutes: Carrier Screening for Cystic Fibrosis RevisitedHealth Economics, 1997
- Willingness to pay for antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosisHealth Economics, 1995
- MOMs (multiples of the median) and DADs (disciminant aneuploidy detection): Improved specificity and cost-effectiveness of biochemial screening for aneuploidy with DADsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Sometimes sensitive, seldom specific: A review of the economics of screeningHealth Economics, 1993
- An economic appraisal of screening for Down's syndrome in pregnancy using maternal age and serum alpha fetoprotein concentrationSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1987
- What Do Patients Value?Medical Care, 1985
- HUMAN BENEFITS AND COSTS OF A NATIONAL SCREENING PROGRAMME FOR NEURAL-TUBE DEFECTSThe Lancet, 1978