Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens : Making psychological science more representative of the human population
Top Cited Papers
- 5 November 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 115 (45), 11401-11405
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721165115
Abstract
Two primary goals of psychological science should be to understand what aspects of human psychology are universal and the way that context and culture produce variability. This requires that we take into account the importance of culture and context in the way that we write our papers and in the types of populations that we sample. However, most research published in our leading journals has relied on sampling WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) populations. One might expect that our scholarly work and editorial choices would by now reflect the knowledge that Western populations may not be representative of humans generally with respect to any given psychological phenomenon. However, as we show here, almost all research published by one of our leading journals, Psychological Science, relies on Western samples and uses these data in an unreflective way to make inferences about humans in general. To take us forward, we offer a set of concrete proposals for authors, journal editors, and reviewers that may lead to a psychological science that is more representative of the human condition.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (SES-0962080)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Culture and the Home-Field DisadvantagePerspectives on Psychological Science, 2010
- Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral scienceBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2010
- Weird people, yes, but also weird experimentsBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2010
- It's not just the subjects – there are too many WEIRD researchersBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2010
- It's not WEIRD, it's WRONG: When Researchers Overlook uNderlying Genotypes, they will not detect universal processesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2010
- (Dis)advantages of student subjects: What is your research question?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2010
- Integrative data analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studies.Psychological Methods, 2009
- The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American.American Psychologist, 2008
- The Native Mind: Biological Categorization and Reasoning in Development and Across Cultures.Psychological Review, 2004
- Social Psychology and Science: Some Lessons From Solomon AschPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 2001