Culture and the Home-Field Disadvantage
- 1 November 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Vol. 5 (6), 708-713
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388772
Abstract
The home-field disadvantage refers to the disadvantage inherent in research that takes a particular cultural group as the starting point or standard for research, including cross-cultural research. We argue that home-field status is a serious handicap that often pushes researchers toward deficit thinking, however good the researchers' intentions may be. In this article, we aim to make this home-field bias more explicit and, in doing so, more avoidable. We discuss three often-overlooked disadvantages that result from this home-field status: the problem of marked versus unmarked culture, the problem of homogenous versus heterogeneous culture, and the problem of regression toward the mean. We also recommend four interventions researchers can apply to avoid the home-field disadvantage or, at the least, attenuate its deleterious effects.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2010
- Weirdness is in the eye of the beholderBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2010
- Power and Perspectives Not TakenPsychological Science, 2006
- The Native Mind: Biological Categorization and Reasoning in Development and Across Cultures.Psychological Review, 2004
- Temporal construal.Psychological Review, 2003
- Writing for CultureCurrent Anthropology, 1999
- Cultural Continuity as a Hedge against Suicide in Canada's First NationsTranscultural Psychiatry, 1998
- The Tree of Life: Universal and Cultural Features of Folkbiological Taxonomies and InductionsCognitive Psychology, 1997
- Suicide Among Canadian Aboriginal PeoplesTranscultural Psychiatric Research Review, 1994
- History and Significance of the EMIC/ETIC DistinctionAnnual Review of Anthropology, 1976