Comparison of body weight and composition measured by two different dual energy X-ray absorptiometry devices and three acquisition modes in obese women
- 30 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 25 (3), 428-437
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2005.11.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Body Composition Measurements by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Differ Between Two Analysis ModesJournal of Clinical Densitometry, 2004
- Half-body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) predicts whole body composition (WBC) in obese patientsClinical Nutrition, 2003
- Dual-Energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition: differences between devices and comparison with reference methodsNutrition, 2002
- Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to four other methods to determine body composition in underweight patients with chronic gastrointestinal diseaseMetabolism, 2000
- Bone Mineral Measurements: A Comparison of Delayed Gamma Neutron Activation, Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Direct Chemical AnalysisOsteoporosis International, 1999
- Bone Mineral and Body Composition Measurements: Cross-Calibration of Pencil-Beam and Fan-Beam Dual-Energy X-Ray AbsorptiometersJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1998
- Six-compartment body composition model: Inter-method comparisons of total body fat measurementInternational Journal of Obesity, 1998
- Comparison of in-vivo body composition using two Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometersEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1998
- Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurements of Body Composition: Effects of Depth and Tissue Thickness, Including Comparisons with Direct AnalysisClinical Science, 1995
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986