Dual-Energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition: differences between devices and comparison with reference methods
- 30 January 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Nutrition
- Vol. 18 (1), 66-70
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-9007(01)00700-6
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Change in intra-abdominal adipose tissue volume during weight loss in obese men and women: correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometric measurementsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Measurement of visceral adipose tissue by DXA combined with anthropometry in obese humansInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Body Composition Determined by Six Different Methods in Women Bilaterally Adrenalectomized for Treatment of Cushing's DiseaseJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1999
- Six-compartment body composition model: Inter-method comparisons of total body fat measurementInternational Journal of Obesity, 1998
- Assessment of research-based body composition techniques in healthy elderly men and women using the 4-compartment model as a criterion methodInternational Journal of Obesity, 1998
- Changes in fat-free mass and fat mass in postpartum women: a comparison of body composition modelsInternational Journal of Obesity, 1997
- Body composition assessment in lean and normal-weight young womenBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1996
- Comparison of body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry to other estimates of body composition during weight loss in obese patients with rheumatoid arthritisScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1996
- Cross-sectional Age Differences in Body Composition in Persons 60 + Years of AgeThe Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 1995
- Precision and accuracy of measurements of whole-body bone mineral: comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometersThe British Journal of Radiology, 1994