The Effects of Using a Clinical Prediction Rule to Prioritize Diagnostic Testing on Transmission and Hospital Burden: A Modeling Example of Early Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
- 15 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 73 (10), 1822-1830
- https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab177
Abstract
Background. Prompt identification of infections is critical for slowing the spread of infectious diseases. However, diagnostic testing shortages are common in emerging diseases, low resource settings, and during outbreaks. This forces difficult decisions regarding who receives a test, often without knowing the implications of those decisions on population-level transmission dynamics. Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are commonly used tools to guide clinical decisions. Methods. Using early severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as an example, we used data from electronic health records to develop a parsimonious 5-variable CPR to identify those who are most likely to test positive. To consider the implications of gains in daily case detection at the population level, we incorporated testing using the CPR into a compartmentalized model of SARS-CoV-2. Results. We found that applying this CPR (area under the curve, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, .68-.70) to prioritize testing increased the proportion of those testing positive in settings of limited testing capacity. We found that prioritized testing led to a delayed and lowered infection peak (ie, "flattens the curve"), with the greatest impact at lower values of the effective reproductive number (such as with concurrent community mitigation efforts), and when higher proportions of infectious persons seek testing. In addition, prioritized testing resulted in reductions in overall infections as well as hospital and intensive care unit burden. Conclusion. We highlight the population-level benefits of evidence-based allocation of limited diagnostic capacity.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Prediction Rules: Challenges, Barriers, and PromiseAnnals of Family Medicine, 2018
- Opportunities and challenges in modeling emerging infectious diseasesScience, 2017
- Mathematical Analysis of an SIQR Influenza Model with Imperfect QuarantineBulletin of Mathematical Biology, 2017
- Laboratory Response to Ebola — West Africa and United StatesMMWR Supplements, 2016
- Isolation of a Novel Coronavirus from a Man with Pneumonia in Saudi ArabiaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Large-Scale Validation of the Centor and McIsaac Scores to Predict Group A Streptococcal PharyngitisJAMA Internal Medicine, 2012
- Predicting Partner HIV Testing and Counseling Following a Partner Notification InterventionAIDS and Behavior, 2011
- Mathematical models in the evaluation of health programmesThe Lancet, 2011
- Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation studyThorax, 2003
- Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic reviewBMJ, 2003