Informed Consent for Pragmatic Trials — The Integrated Consent Model
Top Cited Papers
- 20 February 2014
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 370 (8), 769-772
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmhle1312508
Abstract
The authors argue that informed consent is ethically necessary in pragmatic trials that randomly assign individual patients to treatments, even when treatment options are within the standard of care. They propose integration of a streamlined consent process into routine practice.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risks (and Benefits) in Comparative Effectiveness Research TrialsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Ethics and Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research With Prospective Electronic Clinical DataMedical Care, 2013
- An Ethics Framework for a Learning Health Care System: A Departure from Traditional Research Ethics and Clinical EthicsHastings Center Report, 2013
- The Research‐Treatment Distinction: A Problematic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Have Ethical OversightHastings Center Report, 2013
- The Prompted Optional Randomization Trial: A New Design for Comparative Effectiveness ResearchAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2012
- Pragmatic randomised trials using routine electronic health records: putting them to the testBMJ, 2012
- Can Research and Care Be Ethically Integrated?Hastings Center Report, 2011
- Pruning the regulatory treeNature, 2009
- Prescribing "placebo treatments": results of national survey of US internists and rheumatologistsBMJ, 2008
- Is Informed Consent Always Necessary for Randomized, Controlled Trials?The New England Journal of Medicine, 1999