The Research‐Treatment Distinction: A Problematic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Have Ethical Oversight
Top Cited Papers
- 11 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Hastings Center Report
- Vol. 43 (s1), S4-S15
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.133
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health-National Center for Research Resources (RC1RR028876)
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Burdens on Research Imposed by Institutional Review Boards: The State of the Evidence and Its Implications for Regulatory ReformThe Milbank Quarterly, 2011
- The New Sentinel Network — Improving the Evidence of Medical-Product SafetyThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- A Randomized Trial of Vertebroplasty for Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral FracturesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Lumbar Degenerative SpondylolisthesisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-Impact General Medical JournalsJAMA, 2007
- Systematic review to determine whether participation in a trial influences outcomeBMJ, 2005
- External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”The Lancet, 2005
- Effects of Conjugated Equine Estrogen in Postmenopausal Women With HysterectomyJAMA, 2004
- Failure of Extracranial–Intracranial Arterial Bypass to Reduce the Risk of Ischemic StrokeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- The Ethics of the Randomized Clinical TrialThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1982