Risks (and Benefits) in Comparative Effectiveness Research Trials
- 5 September 2013
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 369 (10), 892-894
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1309322
Abstract
To provide ethically appropriate oversight and informed consent for randomized, controlled comparative effectiveness research trials, investigators should consider, manage, and inform potential participants about at least nine different types of potential risk.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can We Keep It Simple?JAMA Pediatrics, 2013
- Addressing Low-Risk Comparative Effectiveness Research in Proposed Changes to US Federal Regulations Governing ResearchJAMA, 2012
- Ethics in the Midst of Therapeutic EvolutionArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2008