Is routine second-look endoscopy effective after endoscopic hemostasis in acute peptic ulcer bleeding? A meta-analysis
- 1 August 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 76 (2), 283-292
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.441
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sa1612 Effect of Scheduled Second-Look Endoscopy on Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: Interim Analysis of a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial in KoreaGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2011
- Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK auditGut, 2011
- Cost Effectiveness of High-Dose Intravenous Esomeprazole for Peptic Ulcer BleedingPharmacoEconomics, 2010
- Endoscopic hemostasis in peptic ulcer bleeding for patients with high-risk lesions: a series of meta-analysesGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2009
- Endoscopic clipping versus injection and thermo-coagulation in the treatment of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysisGut, 2007
- Outcome of endoscopic treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding: Is a second look necessary? A meta-analysisGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Value of second-look endoscopy after injection therapy for bleeding peptic ulcer: A prospective and randomized trialGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1994
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986