Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison with a conventional instrumented technique
- 31 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Knee
- Vol. 17 (6), 387-391
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.003
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacementThe Knee, 2009
- The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplastyKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2008
- Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with the Oxford Prosthesis in Patients with Medial Compartment ArthritisJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2008
- Alignment of the femoral component in a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A study in 10 cadaver femoraThe Knee, 2007
- Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacementThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2006
- Computer-enhanced insertion of the Oxford Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a Fluoroguide techniqueComputer Aided Surgery, 2004
- Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2003
- The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1998
- Miller—Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 2- to 5-year follow-up evaluationsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1995
- Mechanisms of Failure in Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1988