Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty
- 31 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 18, 2-8
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00291-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incisionThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2001
- Early Catastrophic Tibial Component Wear After Unicompartmental Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1998
- Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery: 10-Year minimum follow-up periodThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1996
- Unicompartmental Prosthesis for GonarthrosisClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1991
- Unicompartmental Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1991
- Medial Unicompartmental Arthroplasty of the KneeClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1989
- Unicondylar knee arthroplasty.The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1989
- Ten-Year Evaluation of Geometric Total Knee ArthroplastyPublished by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,1988
- Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1987
- Unicompartmental Arthroplasty of the KneeClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1987