The effects of cannabis intoxication on motor vehicle collision revisited and revised
Top Cited Papers
- 25 April 2016
- Vol. 111 (8), 1348-1359
- https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13347
Abstract
Aims: To determine whether and to what extent acute cannabis intoxication increases motor vehicle crash risk. Design: Study 1 replicates two published meta-analyses, correcting for methodological shortcomings. Study 2 is an updated meta-analysis using 28 estimates from 21 observational studies. These included studies from three earlier reviews, supplemented by results from structured search in Web of Science and Google Scholar, supplemented by the personal libraries of the research team. Risk estimates were combined using random effects models and meta-regression techniques. Setting: Study 1 replicates the analysis of Asbridge et al, based on 9 studies from 5 countries - published 1982-2007, and Li et al, based on 9 studies from 6 countries - published 2001-10. Study 2 involves studies from 13 countries published in the period 1982-2015. Participants: In Study 1, total counts extracted totalled 50 877 (27 967 cases, 22 910 controls) for Asbridge et al and 93 229 (4 236 cases and 88 993 controls) for Li et al. Study 2 used confounder-adjusted estimates where available (combined sample size of 222 511) and crude counts from the remainder (17 228 total counts), giving a combined sample count of 239 739. Measures: Odds-ratios were used from case-control studies and adjusted odds-ratio analogues from culpability studies. The impact of the substantial variation in confounder adjustment was explored in subsample analyses. Findings: Study 1 substantially revises previous risk estimates downwards, with both the originally reported point estimates lying outside the revised confidence interval . Revised estimates were similar to those of Study 2, which found cannabis-impaired driving associated with a statistically significant risk increase of low-to-moderate magnitude (random effects model odds ratio 1.36 (1.15-1.61), meta-regression odds ratio 1.22 (1.1-1.36)). Subsample analyses found higher odds-ratio estimates for case control studies, low study quality, limited control of confounders, medium quality use data, and not controlling for alcohol intoxication. Conclusions: Acute cannabis intoxication is associated with a statistically significant increase in crash risk. The increase is of low to medium magnitude. Remaining selection effects in the studies used may limit causal interpretation of the pooled estimatesKeywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection biasResearch Synthesis Methods, 2013
- Random and systematic errors in case–control studies calculating the injury risk of driving under the influence of psychoactive substancesAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2013
- A Case-Control Study Estimating Accident Risk for Alcohol, Medicines and Illegal DrugsPLOS ONE, 2012
- Acute cannabis consumption and motor vehicle collision risk: systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysisBMJ, 2012
- Marijuana Use and Motor Vehicle CrashesEpidemiologic Reviews, 2011
- Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample sizeBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2009
- The Trim and Fill MethodPublished by Wiley ,2005
- Dose related risk of motor vehicle crashes after cannabis useDrug and Alcohol Dependence, 2004
- Marijuana Use and Injury Events Resulting in Hospitalization, ,Annals of Epidemiology, 2003
- A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2000