Random and systematic errors in case–control studies calculating the injury risk of driving under the influence of psychoactive substances
- 28 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Accident Analysis & Prevention
- Vol. 52, 144-153
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.034
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Repeatability of oral fluid collection methods for THC measurementForensic Science International, 2012
- External quality assessment of multi-analyte chromatographic methods in oral fluidClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2010
- Drug Testing in Oral Fluid—Evaluation of Sample Collection DevicesJournal of Analytical Toxicology, 2008
- Marijuana use and car crash injuryAddiction, 2005
- The Contribution of Alcohol to Serious Car Crash InjuriesEpidemiology, 2004
- The alcohol-related accident risk in Germany: procedure, methods and resultsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2004
- Psychoactive substance use and the risk of motor vehicle accidentsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2003
- Comparison of the prevalence of alcohol, cannabis and other drugs between 900 injured drivers and 900 control subjects: results of a French collaborative studyForensic Science International, 2003
- The Effects of Collection Methods On Oral Fluid Codeine ConcentrationsJournal of Analytical Toxicology, 2000
- Abbreviated Injury Scale UnificationJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 1999