Comparison of the analytical sensitivity of seven commonly used commercial SARS-CoV-2 automated molecular assays
- 5 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Virology
- Vol. 130, 104578
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104578
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- National Institutes of Health
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Abbott ID Now, DiaSorin Simplexa, and CDC FDA Emergency Use Authorization Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Nasopharyngeal and Nasal Swabs from Individuals Diagnosed with COVID-19Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020
- Clinical Evaluation of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test and a Diagnostic Platform Switch during 48 Hours in the Midst of the COVID-19 PandemicJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020
- Comparative Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Assays Using Seven Different Primer-Probe Sets and One Assay KitJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020
- Rapid and visual detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) by a reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assayClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2020
- Rapid Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 Using a CRISPR-based DETECTR Lateral Flow AssayPublished by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory ,2020
- First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United StatesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019The New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, ChinaThe Lancet, 2020
- A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family clusterThe Lancet, 2020
- Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCREurosurveillance, 2020