Communication Outcomes of Critical Imaging Results in a Computerized Notification System
Open Access
- 1 July 2007
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 14 (4), 459-466
- https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.m2280
Abstract
Objective: Communication of abnormal test results in the outpatient setting is prone to error. Using information technology can improve communication and improve patient safety. We standardized processes and procedures in a computerized test result notification system and examined their effectiveness to reduce errors in communication of abnormal imaging results. Design: We prospectively analyzed outcomes of computerized notification of abnormal test results (alerts) that providers did not explicitly acknowledge receiving in the electronic medical record of an ambulatory multispecialty clinic. Measurements: In the study period, 190,799 outpatient visits occurred and 20,680 outpatient imaging tests were performed. We tracked 1,017 transmitted alerts electronically. Using a taxonomy of communication errors, we focused on alerts in which errors in acknowledgment and reception occurred. Unacknowledged alerts were identified through electronic tracking. Among these, we performed chart reviews to determine any evidence of documented response, such as ordering a follow-up test or consultation. If no response was documented, we contacted providers by telephone to determine their awareness of the test results and any follow-up action they had taken. These processes confirmed the presence or absence of alert reception. Results: Providers failed to acknowledge receipt of over one-third (368 of 1,017) of transmitted alerts. In 45 of these cases (4% of abnormal results), the imaging study was completely lost to follow-up 4 weeks after the date of study. Overall, 0.2% of outpatient imaging was lost to follow-up. The rate of lost to follow-up imaging was 0.02% per outpatient visit. Conclusion: Imaging results continue to be lost to follow-up in a computerized test result notification system that alerted physicians through the electronic medical record. Although comparison data from previous studies are limited, the rate of results lost to follow-up appears to be lower than that reported in systems that do not use information technology comparable to what we evaluated.This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identifying Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care Using an Electronic Screening AlgorithmArchives of Internal Medicine, 2007
- To Err Is Human, to Correct Divine: The Emergence of Technology-Based Communication SystemsJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2006
- Illustrating the Root-Cause-Analysis Process: Creation of a Safety Net with a Semiautomated Process for the Notification of Critical Findings in Diagnostic ImagingJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2005
- Evaluation and outcomes of women with a breast lump and a normal mammogram resultJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2005
- Communication Errors in Radiology: A Liability Cost AnalysisJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2005
- Reporting significant unexpected findings: The emergence of information technology solutionsJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2005
- A String of Mistakes: The Importance of Cascade Analysis in Describing, Counting, and Preventing Medical ErrorsAnnals of Family Medicine, 2004
- Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammogramsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2004
- Improving Safety with Information TechnologyThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Improving Response to Critical Laboratory Results with Automation: Results of a Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1999