Improving Response to Critical Laboratory Results with Automation: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Open Access
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 6 (6), 512-522
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1999.0060512
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of an automatic alerting system on the time until treatment is ordered for patients with critical laboratory results. Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Intervention: A computer system to detect critical conditions and automatically notify the responsible physician via the hospital's paging system. Patients: Medical and surgical inpatients at a large academic medical center. One two-month study period for each service. Main outcomes: Interval from when a critical result was available for review until an appropriate treatment was ordered. Secondary outcomes were the time until the critical condition resolved and the frequency of adverse events. Methods: The alerting system looked for 12 conditions involving laboratory results and medications. For intervention patients, the covering physician was automatically notified about the presence of the results. For control patients, no automatic notification was made. Chart review was performed to determine the outcomes. Results: After exclusions, 192 alerting situations (94 interventions, 98 controls) were analyzed. The intervention group had a 38 percent shorter median time interval (1.0 hours vs. 1.6 hours, P = 0.003; mean, 4.1 vs. 4.6 hours, P = 0.003) until an appropriate treatment was ordered. The time until the alerting condition resolved was less in the intervention group (median, 8.4 hours vs. 8.9 hours, P = 0.11; mean, 14.4 hours vs. 20.2 hours, P = 0.11), although these results did not achieve statistical significance. The impact of the intervention was more pronounced for alerts that did not meet the laboratory's critical reporting criteria. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of adverse events. Conclusion: An automatic alerting system reduced the time until an appropriate treatment was ordered for patients who had critical laboratory results. Information technologies that facilitate the transmission of important patient data can potentially improve the quality of care.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Promptly Are Inpatients Treated for Critical Laboratory Results?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1998
- Does the computerized display of charges affect inpatient ancillary test utilization?Archives of Internal Medicine, 1997
- A Randomized Trial of "Corollary Orders" to Prevent Errors of OmissionJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1997
- A Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials to Evaluate Computer-Based Clinical Reminder Systems for Preventive Care in the Ambulatory SettingJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1996
- Design of a Clinical Event MonitorComputers and Biomedical Research, 1996
- Potential Identifiability and Preventability of Adverse Events Using Information SystemsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994
- Rationale for the Arden SyntaxComputers and Biomedical Research, 1994
- Computer-based Physician Order Entry: The State of the ArtJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994
- Computerized physician order entry and quality of careQuality Management in Health Care, 1994
- Improving blood transfusion practice: role of a computerized hospital information systemTransfusion, 1992