“Safety in Numbers” re-examined: Can we make valid or practical inferences from available evidence?
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Accident Analysis & Prevention
- Vol. 43 (1), 235-240
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.015
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of 20 mph traffic speed zones on road injuries in London, 1986-2006: controlled interrupted time series analysisBMJ, 2009
- The non-linearity of risk and the promotion of environmentally sustainable transportAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2009
- Motor Vehicle Crash Injury Rates by Mode of Travel, United States: Using Exposure-Based Methods to Quantify DifferencesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- Reducing crashes and injuries among young drivers: what kind of prevention should we be focusing on?Injury Prevention, 2006
- Safety in Numbers: Data from Oakland, CaliforniaTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006
- Traffic injury data, policy, and public health: Lessons from Boston ChinatownJournal of Urban Health, 2002
- Area-wide urban traffic calming schemes: a meta-analysis of safety effectsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2001
- Re–examining safety in numbers: interactions between risk dilution and collective detection depend upon predator targeting behaviourProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1998
- Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilanceTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1998
- Models for predicting accidents at junctions where pedestrians and cyclists are involved. How well do they fit?Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1993