Measures of promptness of cancer diagnosis in primary care: secondary analysis of national audit data on patients with 18 common and rarer cancers
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 7 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 108 (3), 686-690
- https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.1
Abstract
Background: Evidence is needed about the promptness of cancer diagnosis and associations between its measures. Methods: We analysed data from the National Audit of Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care 2009–10 exploring the association between the interval from first symptomatic presentation to specialist referral (the primary care interval, or ‘interval’ hereafter) and the number of pre-referral consultations. Results: Among 13 035 patients with any of 18 different cancers, most (82%) were referred after 1 (58%) or 2 (25%) consultations (median intervals 0 and 15 days, respectively) while 9%, 4% and 5% patients required 3, 4 or 5+ consultations (median intervals 34, 47 and 97 days, respectively) (Spearman’s r=0.70). The association was at least moderate for any cancer (Spearman’s r range: 0.55 (prostate)−0.77 (brain)). Patients with cancers with a higher proportion of three or more pre-referral consultations typically also had longer median intervals (e.g., multiple myeloma) and vice versa (e.g., breast cancer). Conclusion: The number of pre-referral consultations has construct validity as a measure of the primary care interval. Developing interventions to reduce the number of pre-referral consultations can help improve the timeliness of cancer diagnosis, and constitutes a priority for early diagnosis initiatives and research.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variation in promptness of presentation among 10,297 patients subsequently diagnosed with one of 18 cancers: Evidence from a National Audit of Cancer Diagnosis in Primary CareInternational Journal of Cancer, 2014
- Cancer detection and primary care…revisitedThe Lancet Oncology, 2012
- Variation in number of general practitioner consultations before hospital referral for cancer: findings from the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in EnglandThe Lancet Oncology, 2012
- The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosisBritish Journal of Cancer, 2012
- Identifying patients with suspected colorectal cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithmBritish Journal of General Practice, 2012
- Time intervals from first symptom to treatment of cancer: a cohort study of 2,212 newly diagnosed cancer patientsBMC Health Services Research, 2011
- Time to diagnosis and mortality in colorectal cancer: a cohort study in primary careBritish Journal of Cancer, 2011
- Cancer survival in England and the influence of early diagnosis: what can we learn from recent EUROCARE results?British Journal of Cancer, 2009
- The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patientsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Stable interference of EWS–FLI1 in an Ewing sarcoma cell line impairs IGF-1/IGF-1R signalling and reveals TOPK as a new targetBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009