The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 13 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 106 (7), 1262-1267
- https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.68
Abstract
Early diagnosis is a key factor in improving the outcomes of cancer patients. A greater understanding of the pre-diagnostic patient pathways is vital yet, at present, research in this field lacks consistent definitions and methods. As a consequence much early diagnosis research is difficult to interpret. A consensus group was formed with the aim of producing guidance and a checklist for early cancer-diagnosis researchers. A consensus conference approach combined with nominal group techniques was used. The work was supported by a systematic review of early diagnosis literature, focussing on existing instruments used to measure time points and intervals in early cancer-diagnosis research. A series of recommendations for definitions and methodological approaches is presented. This is complemented by a checklist that early diagnosis researchers can use when designing and conducting studies in this field. The Aarhus checklist is a resource for early cancer-diagnosis research that should promote greater precision and transparency in both definitions and methods. Further work will examine whether the checklist can be readily adopted by researchers, and feedback on the guidance will be used in future updates.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic reviewBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Time to diagnosis and mortality in colorectal cancer: a cohort study in primary careBritish Journal of Cancer, 2011
- Determinants of Medical System Delay in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer Within the Veteran Affairs Health SystemDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2010
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi studyQuality of Life Research, 2010
- Inter-rater reliability of case-note audit: a systematic reviewJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2007
- Early symptoms of ovarian cancer: a case–control study without recall biasFamily Practice, 2005
- Symptoms of possible oncological significance: separating the wheat from the chaffBMJ, 2002
- The waiting time paradox: population based retrospective study of treatment delay and survival of women with endometrial cancer in ScotlandBMJ, 2002
- Sex differences in physical symptoms: The contribution of symptom perception theorySocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1997
- [Consensus conference: methodology and contribution].1994