Embedded Performance Validity Tests in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test—Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test—Revised: A Replication Study
Open Access
- 1 November 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Vol. 33 (7), 895-900
- https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx111
Abstract
Embedded performance validity tests (PVTs) within the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test—Revised (HVLT-R) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test—Revised (BVMT-R) were recently identified. This study aimed to further validate/replicate these embedded PVTs. Eighty clinically referred veterans who underwent neuropsychological evaluation were included. Validity groups were established by passing/failing 2–3 well-validated PVTs, with 75% (n = 60) classified as valid and 25% (n = 20) noncredible. Fifty-two percent of valid participants were cognitively impaired. HVLT-R Recognition Discrimination (RD) of ≤5 yielded 67% sensitivity/80% specificity for identifying noncredible performance. Removal of seven valid participants with an amnestic profile who produced a false positive, improved specificity to 92%, which replicated the original findings. Replication efforts failed for BVMT-R Percent Retained; however, significant findings for RD were elucidated. Replication efforts were positive for the HVLT-R embedded PVT, corroborating its ability to identify invalid performance in this heterogeneous clinical veteran sample with and without cognitive impairment.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Embedded performance validity tests within the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test – RevisedThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2016
- The Role of Processing Speed in the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test – RevisedThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2013
- The Efficiency and Accuracy of The Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1, Errors on the First 10 Items of The Test of Memory Malingering, and Five Embedded Measures in Predicting Invalid Test PerformanceArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2012
- Use of Trial 1 of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) as a Screening Measure of Effort: Suggested Discontinuation RulesThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2011
- High Specificity of the Word Memory Test and Medical Symptom Validity Test in Groups with Severe Verbal Memory ImpairmentApplied Neuropsychology, 2011
- American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effort, Response Bias, and MalingeringThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2009
- Aggregation Across Multiple Indicators Improves the Detection of Malingering: Relationship to Likelihood RatiosThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2008
- Assessing the Probability That a Positive Report is False: An Approach for Molecular Epidemiology StudiesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004
- Diagnostic Criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed Standards for Clinical Practice and ResearchThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1999
- Revision of the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test: Studies of normal performance, reliability, and validity.Psychological Assessment, 1996