The Efficiency and Accuracy of The Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1, Errors on the First 10 Items of The Test of Memory Malingering, and Five Embedded Measures in Predicting Invalid Test Performance
Open Access
- 27 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Vol. 27 (4), 417-432
- https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acs044
Abstract
The current study attempted to improve upon the efficiency and accuracy of one of the most frequently administered measures of test validity, the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) by utilizing two short forms (TOMM trial 1 or TOMM1; and errors on the first 10 items of TOMM1 or TOMMe10). In addition, we cross-validated the accuracy of five embedded measures frequently used in malingering research. TOMM1 and TOMMe10 were highly accurate in predicting test validity (area under the curve [AUC] = 92% and 87%, respectively; TOMM1 ≤40 and TOMMe10 ≥1; sensitivities >70% and specificities >90%). A logistic regression of five embedded measures showed better accuracy compared with any individual embedded measure alone or in combination (AUC = 87%). TOMM1 and TOMMe10 provide evidence of greater sensitivity to invalid test performance compared with the standard TOMM administration and the use of regression improved the accuracy of the five embedded cognitive measures.Keywords
This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sensitivity of the Test of Memory Malingering and the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test: A Replication StudyApplied Neuropsychology, 2011
- Comparison of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Effort Index and Stand-Alone Symptom Validity Tests in a Military SampleArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2011
- Symptom Validity Test Performance in U.S. Veterans Referred for Evaluation of Mild TBIApplied Neuropsychology, 2010
- The Need For Continuous and Comprehensive Sampling of Effort/Response Bias During Neuropsychological ExaminationsThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2009
- The effect of distraction on the Word Memory Test and Test of Memory Malingering performance in patients with a severe brain injuryJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2008
- Examining the Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1 and Word Memory Test Immediate Recognition as Screening Tools for Insufficient EffortAssessment, 2007
- American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) Practice Guidelines for Neuropsychological Assessment and ConsultationThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2007
- Coverage of the Test of Memory Malingering, Victoria Symptom Validity Test, and Word Memory Test on the Internet: Is test security threatened?Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2006
- SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF FINGER TAPPING TEST SCORES FOR THE DETECTION OF SUSPECT EFFORTThe Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2005
- The effect of depression and anxiety on the TOMM in community-dwelling older adultsArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2004