Stimulating employee ambidexterity and employee engagement in SMEs
- 15 May 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Management Decision
- Vol. 55 (4), 662-680
- https://doi.org/10.1108/md-02-2016-0107
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the emerging theory of ambidexterity by developing measures to assess employee ambidexterity. Specifically, it identifies and tests the importance of the relationship between the organisational context and employee ambidexterity within small and medium enterprises (SMEs). The research used a survey method to investigate SMEs in Nigeria. Two hundred SMEs were selected from across Nigeria to participate in the study and 72 companies responded, representing a 36 per cent response rate. The study sample comprised 398 shop-floor employees from 72 small and medium-sized manufacturing and service organisations. The paper tests a model that sheds insight into the linkages between the organisational context, employee ambidexterity and employee engagement. Specifically, the model portrays significant relationships that exist between organisational context, employee ambidexterity and employee engagement. The results show that understanding the appropriate organisational contexts improves employee ambidexterity. Therefore, SMEs with the appropriate organisational contexts for employee ambidexterity and employee engagement will increase their potential for growth and survival. The paper develops a conceptual model of the organisational context that improves employee ambidexterity and employee engagement.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Entrepreneurial orientation, management commitment, and human capital: The internationalization of SMEs in IndiaJournal of Business Research, 2011
- Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and ExploitCalifornia Management Review, 2011
- Organisational culture's influence on tacit knowledge‐sharing behaviourJournal of Knowledge Management, 2011
- Exploratory learning and exploitative learning in different organizational structuresAsia Pacific Journal of Management, 2009
- Organising new business development: open innovation at DegussaEuropean Journal of Innovation Management, 2008
- Relational Job Design and the Motivation to Make a Prosocial DifferenceAcademy of Management Review, 2007
- Treatments of Missing Data: A Monte Carlo Comparison of RBHDI, Iterative Stochastic Regression Imputation, and Expectation-MaximizationStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2000
- Strategizing Throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic RenewalAcademy of Management Review, 2000
- Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and InnovationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1990
- Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement ErrorJournal of Marketing Research, 1981