Developing a cancer‐specific geriatric assessment
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 4 October 2005
- Vol. 104 (9), 1998-2005
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21422
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the U.S. population ages, there is an emerging need to characterize the “functional age” of older patients with cancer to tailor treatment decisions and stratify outcomes based on factors other than chronologic age. The goals of the current study were to develop a brief, but comprehensive, primarily self-administered cancer-specific geriatric assessment measure and to determine its feasibility as measured by 1) the percentage of patients able to complete the measure on their own, 2) the length of time to complete, and 3) patient satisfaction with the measure. METHODS The geriatric and oncology literature was reviewed to choose validated measures of geriatric assessment across the following domains: functional status, comorbidity, cognition, psychological status, social functioning and support, and nutritional status. Criteria applied to geriatric assessment measurements included reliability, validity, brevity, and ability to self-administer. The measure was administered to patients with breast carcinoma, lung carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, or lymphoma who were fluent in English and receiving chemotherapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) or the University of Chicago (Chicago, IL). RESULTS The instrument was completed by 43 patients (mean age, 74 yrs; range, 65–87 yrs). The majority had AJCC Stage IV disease (68%). The mean time to completion of the assessment was 27 minutes (range, 8–45 mins). Most patients were able to complete the self-administered portion of the assessment without assistance (78%) and were satisfied with the questionnaire length (90%). There was no association noted between age (P = 0.56) or educational level (P = 0.99) and the ability to complete the assessment without assistance. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort, this brief but comprehensive geriatric assessment could be completed by the majority of patients without assistance. Prospective trials of its generalizability, reliability, and validity are justified. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Reevaluation of the Duration of Survival after the Onset of DementiaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Screening for anxiety and depression in cancer patients: the effects of disease and treatmentEuropean Journal of Cancer, 1994
- Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trialsThe Lancet, 1993
- Intercommunity variations in the association between social ties and mortality in the elderly: A comparative analysis of three communitiesAnnals of Epidemiology, 1993
- Screening for depression and anxiety in cancer patients using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 1993
- The MOS social support surveySocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1991
- Relation between cognitive impairment and early death in the elderly.BMJ, 1990
- Screening for Adjustment Disorders and Major Depressive Disorders in Cancer In-PatientsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1990
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983
- Prognostic effect of weight loss prior tochemotherapy in cancer patientsAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1980