Clinical guidelines: Developing guidelines
- 27 February 1999
- Vol. 318 (7183), 593-596
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7183.593
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making.2000
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 1998
- Assessing the Predictive Validity of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Criteria for Performing Carotid EndarterectomyInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1998
- Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and GermanThe Lancet, 1997
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of babel bias?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994
- How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. II: SurgicalStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: MedicalStatistics in Medicine, 1989