Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making.
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Vol. 34 (7), 1429-48
Abstract
To test the ability of two different clinical practice guideline formats to influence physician ordering of electrodiagnostic tests in low back pain. Randomized controlled trial of the effect of practice guidelines on self-reported physician test ordering behavior in response to a series of 12 clinical vignettes. Data came from a national random sample of 900 U.S. neurologists, physical medicine physicians, and general internists. Two different versions of a practice guideline for the use of electrodiagnostic tests (EDT) were developed by the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Low Back Problems Panel. The two guidelines were similar in content but varied in the specificity of their recommendations. The proportion of clinical vignettes for which EDTs were ordered for appropriate and inappropriate clinical indications in each of three physician groups were randomly assigned to receive vignettes alone, vignettes plus the nonspecific version of the guideline, or vignettes plus the specific version of the guideline. The response rate to the survey was 71 percent. The proportion of appropriate vignettes for which EDTs were ordered averaged 77 percent for the no guideline group, 71 percent for the nonspecific guideline group, and 79 percent for the specific guideline group (p = .002). The corresponding values for the number of EDTs ordered for inappropriate vignettes were 32 percent, 32 percent, and 26 percent, respectively (p = .08). Pairwise comparisons showed that physicians receiving the nonspecific guidelines ordered fewer EDTs for appropriate clinical vignettes than did physicians receiving no guidelines (p = .02). Furthermore, compared to physicians receiving nonspecific guidelines, physicians receiving specific guidelines ordered significantly more EDTs for appropriate vignettes (p = .0007) and significantly fewer EDTs for inappropriate vignettes (p = .04). The clarity and clinical applicability of a guideline may be important attributes that contribute to the effects of practice guidelines.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational studyBMJ, 1998
- Developing valid guidelines: methodological and procedural issues from the North of England Evidence Based Guideline Development Project.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1996
- Users' guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Developing clinically valid practice guidelinesJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1995
- General practitioners' decision making for mental health problems: Outcomes and ecological validityJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- Physician Variation in Diagnostic Testing for Low Back Pain. Who You See Is What You GetArthritis & Rheumatism, 1994
- Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Practice policies--guidelines for methodsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990
- Written case simulations: Do they predict physicians' behavior?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1990
- A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical TechnologiesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1986