Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 31 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Radiology
- Vol. 22 (5), 1023-1032
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2340-y
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate intra- and interobserver reproducibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) for breast masses. Methods For intraobserver reproducibility, each observer obtained three consecutive SWE images of 758 masses that were visible on ultrasound. 144 (19%) were malignant. Weighted kappa was used to assess the agreement of qualitative elastographic features; the reliability of quantitative measurements was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). For the interobserver reproducibility, a blinded observer reviewed images and agreement on features was determined. Results Mean age was 50 years; mean mass size was 13 mm. Qualitatively, SWE images were at least reasonably similar for 666/758 (87.9%). Intraclass correlation for SWE diameter, area and perimeter was almost perfect (ICC ≥ 0.94). Intraobserver reliability for maximum and mean elasticity was almost perfect (ICC = 0.84 and 0.87) and was substantial for the ratio of mass-to-fat elasticity (ICC = 0.77). Interobserver agreement was moderate for SWE homogeneity (κ = 0.57), substantial for qualitative colour assessment of maximum elasticity (κ = 0.66), fair for SWE shape (κ = 0.40), fair for B-mode mass margins (κ = 0.38), and moderate for B-mode mass shape (κ = 0.58), orientation (κ = 0.53) and BI-RADS assessment (κ = 0.59). Conclusions SWE is highly reproducible for assessing elastographic features of breast masses within and across observers. SWE interpretation is at least as consistent as that of BI-RADS ultrasound B-mode features. Key Points • Shear wave ultrasound elastography can measure the stiffness of breast tissue • It provides a qualitatively and quantitatively interpretable colour-coded map of tissue stiffness • Intraobserver reproducibility of SWE is almost perfect while intraobserver reproducibility of SWE proved to be moderate to substantial • The most reproducible SWE features between observers were SWE image homogeneity and maximum elasticityKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shear-wave Elastography Improves the Specificity of Breast US: The BE1 Multinational Study of 939 MassesRadiology, 2012
- Breast Mass Evaluation: Factors Influencing the Quality of US ElastographyRadiology, 2011
- Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast massesBreast Cancer Research, 2010
- Breast Lesions: Quantitative Elastography with Supersonic Shear Imaging—Preliminary ResultsRadiology, 2010
- Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasoundEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2008
- Real‐time elastography — an advanced method of ultrasound: first results in 108 patients with breast lesionsUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breastsLa radiologia medica, 2006
- Supplemental screening sonography in dense breastsRadiologic Clinics of North America, 2004
- Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative Sensitivity and Specificity of Mammography and Sonography in Young Women with SymptomsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2003
- The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of ReliabilityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1973