Clinical Trials of Meditation Practices in Health Care: Characteristics and Quality
- 1 December 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
- Vol. 14 (10), 1199-1213
- https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2008.0307
Abstract
To provide a descriptive overview of the clinical trials assessing meditation practices for health care. Systematic review of the literature. Comprehensive searches were conducted in 17 electronic bibliographic databases through September 2005. Other sources of potentially relevant studies included hand searches, reference tracking, contacting experts, and gray literature searches. Included studies were clinical trials with 10 or more adult participants using any meditation practice, providing quantitative data on health-related outcomes, and published in English. Two independent reviewers assessed study relevance, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the studies. Four hundred clinical trials on meditation (72% described as randomized) were included in the review (publication years 1956-2005). Five broad categories of meditation practices were identified: mantra meditation, mindfulness meditation, yoga, t'ai chi, and qigong. The three most studied clinical conditions were hypertension, miscellaneous cardiovascular diseases, and substance abuse. Psychosocial measures were the most frequently reported outcomes. Outcome measures of psychiatric and psychological symptoms dominate the outcomes of interest. Overall, the methodological quality of clinical trials is poor, but has significantly improved over time by 0.014 points every year (95% CI, 0.005, 0.023). Most clinical trials on meditation practices are generally characterized by poor methodological quality with significant threats to validity in every major quality domain assessed. Despite a statistically significant improvement in the methodological quality over time, it is imperative that future trials on meditation be rigorous in design, execution, analysis, and the reporting of results.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Perspective on the Emergence of Meditation Techniques for Medical DisordersThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2006
- Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Meditation Techniques as Treatments for Medical IllnessThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2006
- Sudarshan Kriya Yogic Breathing in the Treatment of Stress, Anxiety, and Depression: Part I—Neurophysiologic ModelThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2005
- An Introduction to Kundalini Yoga Meditation Techniques That Are Specific for the Treatment of Psychiatric DisordersThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2004
- The Complications of Meditation Trials and Research: Issues Raised by the Robinson, Mathews, and Witek-Janusek Paper—"Psycho-Endocrine-Immune Response to Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in Individuals Infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Quasiexperimental Study"The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2003
- The Efficacy Paradox in Randomized Controlled Trials of CAM and Elsewhere: Beware of the Placebo TrapThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2001
- Integrity and Research: Introducing the Concept of Dual Blindness. How Blind Are Double-Blind Clinical Trials in Alternative Medicine?The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2000
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 1998
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1995