Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study
Top Cited Papers
- 13 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 56 (3), 177-184
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- St. Jude Medical
- The Meijer Lavino Foundation
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Angiographic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME Study: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel EvaluationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2010
- Validation of Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With Fractional Flow Reserve for the Detection of Significant Coronary Heart DiseaseCirculation, 2009
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery DiseaseThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic BurdenCirculation, 2008
- Universal Definition of Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 2007
- Rationale and design of the fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation (FAME) studyAmerican Heart Journal, 2007
- Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary DiseaseThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel DiseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Optimum guidance of complex PCI by coronary pressure measurementHeart, 2004
- Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel DiseaseThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2001