Rationale and design of the fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation (FAME) study
Open Access
- 31 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 154 (4), 632-636
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.012
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Functionally Nonsignificant StenosisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007
- Late Clinical Events After Clopidogrel Discontinuation May Limit the Benefit of Drug-Eluting Stents: An Observational Study of Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal StentsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: Design, rationale, and run-in phaseAmerican Heart Journal, 2006
- Drug-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Intermediate Lesions: Pooled Analysis From Four Randomized TrialsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Remain Superior to Bare-Metal Stents at Two Years: Medium-Term Results From the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) RegistryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- Thirty-Month Outcome After Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Versus Conventional Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary InterventionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel DiseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary InterventionsEuropean Heart Journal, 2005
- Simultaneous Assessment of Fractional and Coronary Flow Reserves in Cardiac Transplant RecipientsCirculation, 2003
- Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patientsEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1999