Atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis in general practice and the open population: a systematic review
Open Access
- 24 March 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
- Vol. 34 (2), 143-150
- https://doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2016.1160629
Abstract
Objective: To examine whether significant differences exist between the self-reported prevalence of atopic disorders in the open population compared with physician diagnosed prevalence of atopic disorders in general practice. Methods: Medline (OvidSP), PubMed Publisher, EMBASE, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register databases were systematically reviewed for articles providing data on the prevalence of asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema in a GP setting. Studies were only included when they had a cross-sectional or cohort design and included more than 100 children (aged 0-18 years) in a general practice setting. All ISAAC studies (i.e. the open population) that geographically matched a study selected from the first search, were also included. A quality assessment was conducted. The primary outcome measures were prevalence of eczema, asthma and allergic rhinitis in children aged 0-18 years. Results: The overall quality of the included studies was good. The annual and lifetime prevalences of the atopic disorders varied greatly in both general practice and the open population. On average, the prevalence of atopic disorders was higher in the open population. Conclusion: There are significant differences between the self-reported prevalence of atopic disorders in the open population compared with physician diagnosed prevalence of atopic disorders in general practice. Data obtained in the open population cannot simply be extrapolated to the general practice setting. This should be taken into account when considering a research topic or requirements for policy development. GPs should be aware of the possible misclassification of allergic disorders in their practice. KEY POINTS Epidemiological data on atopic disorders in children can be obtained from various sources, each having its own advantages and limitations. On average, the prevalence of atopic disorders is higher in the open population. GPs should take into account the possible misclassification of atopic disorders in their practice population. Policymakers should be aware that data obtained in the open population cannot simply be extrapolated to the general practice setting.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Establishing the incidence and prevalence of clinician‐diagnosed allergic conditions in children and adolescents using routinely collected data from general practicesClinical & Experimental Allergy, 2009
- Incidence and prevalence of multiple allergic disorders recorded in a national primary care databaseJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2008
- Original article: Frequency and impact of allergic rhinitis in asthma patients in everyday general medical practice: a French observational cross‐sectional studyAllergy, 2008
- Operational definitions of asthma in studies on its aetiologyEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2005
- Deprivation, smoking, and quality of life in asthmaArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2005
- The birth of the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) Serendipity at the border of Lac LemanFamily Practice, 2002
- Is childhood allergy more common amongst an island population?Perspectives in Public Health, 2000
- What do parents of wheezy children understand by "wheeze"?Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2000
- Differences in parental‐ and self‐report of asthma, rhinitis and eczema among Italian adolescentsEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1999
- Hay fever, eczema, and wheeze: a nationwide UK study (ISAAC, international study of asthma and allergies in childhood)Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1999