Offering Individual Genetic Research Results: Context Matters
- 30 June 2010
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science Translational Medicine
- Vol. 2 (38), 38cm20
- https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3000952
Abstract
Beyond a fundamental duty to rescue, a one-size-fits-all threshold cannot be developed for decisions about the return of individual results.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multidimensional Results Reporting to Participants in Genomic Studies: Getting It RightScience Translational Medicine, 2010
- Prospective Biorepository Participants' Perspectives on Access to Research ResultsJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2009
- Assessing the understanding of biobank participantsAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2009
- Building and Maintaining Trust in a Community-Based Participatory Research PartnershipAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2008
- The Future of Incidental Findings: Should They be Viewed as Benefits?The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2008
- Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and RecommendationsJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2008
- The Uneasy Ethical and Legal Underpinnings of Large-Scale Genomic BiobanksAnnual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 2007
- Letting the Gene Out of the Bottle: A Comment on Returning Individual Research Results to ParticipantsAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2006
- Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working groupAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2006
- The Duty to Rescue and the Slippery Slope ProblemSocial Theory and Practice, 1990