The Future of Incidental Findings: Should They be Viewed as Benefits?
Open Access
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
- Vol. 36 (2), 341-351
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00278.x
Abstract
The possibility of generating incidental findings — in both research and clinical contexts — has long been regarded as a risk of these enterprises. Should incidental findings (IFs) in research also be regarded as potential benefits? At first glance, it would seem they ought to be. After all, in particular circumstances or given a particular set of values, any piece of information can be beneficial. Therefore, it may seem incoherent or unduly paternalistic to regard IFs only as risks. Moreover, developments in science and technology increasingly transform what was once of uncertain meaning and dubious value into information that is likely to have clear meaning and potential personal value, if not obvious clinical utility. For these reasons, it would seem that in the future, IFs should be treated as potential benefits in the design and regulation of research.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and RecommendationsJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2008
- Wolf et al. replyNature, 2007
- The Changing Face of "Misidentified Paternity"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2007
- Les psychothérapies psychanalytiques n'existent pasLe Carnet PSY, 2007
- The IncidentalomeJAMA, 2006
- Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging ResearchScience, 2006
- Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Not a Clinical Entity and Should Not Be TreatedArchives of Neurology, 2005
- What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?JAMA, 2000
- Public understanding of the new geneticsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987