Reproducibility of instrumented knee joint laxity measurement in healthy subjects
Open Access
- 6 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Rheumatology
- Vol. 45 (5), 595-599
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kei243
Abstract
Objective. To determine the reproducibility of frontal plane knee joint laxity measurement through the assessment of intra- and inter-rater reliability coefficients and intra- and inter-rater agreement coefficients. Methods. Two raters independently assessed the laxity of the knee joint in the frontal plane by three repeated measurements. Fourteen days later the assessment was repeated. Complete data were obtained from 20 healthy subjects. Laxity was assessed using a device which consisted of a chair with a free-moving arm that supported the subject's lower leg. Medial and lateral loads were applied, resulting in a varus and valgus movement in the knee joint. The intra- and inter-rater reliability coefficients [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC)] were estimated, as were the intra- and inter-rater agreement parameters [standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable difference (MDD)]. Results. Adequate intra-rater reliability (ICC>0.80) was calculated for each rater's measurements of laxity. The inter-rater reliability was less adequate (ICC=0.65) when calculated using the first day's measurements. However, inter-rater reliability was adequate (ICC=0.88) when calculated using the day 14 measurements. The intra-rater measurement error calculated across occasions was 1.3° for individual subjects. This resulted in an MDD of 3.7°. The inter-rater measurement error, i.e. the SEM and MDD, was higher (1.5° and 4.3°, respectively). Conclusions. Intra-rater reliability of knee joint laxity measurement is good. Adequate training of raters establishes the basis for good inter-rater reliability. In clinical trials, it is preferable for one trained rater to perform the laxity measurement. The measurement of knee joint laxity is limited due to its relatively high measurement error in individual subjects; therefore, this measurement should be restricted to group assessment rather than individual patient assessment.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Structural joint changes, malalignment, and laxity in osteoarthritis of the kneeScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 2005
- Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literatureAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2004
- Physical functioning over three years in knee osteoarthritis: Role of psychosocial, local mechanical, and neuromuscular factorsArthritis & Rheumatism, 2003
- Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsivenessQuality of Life Research, 2001
- Laxity in healthy and osteoarthritic kneesArthritis & Rheumatism, 1999
- Does laxity alter the relationship between strength and physical function in knee osteoarthritis?Arthritis & Rheumatism, 1999
- KNEE LAXITY IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRTTIS AND RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISRheumatology, 1996
- Knee Laxity in Symptomatic OsteoarthritisClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1994
- The effect of marginal osteophytes on reduction of varus‐valgus instability in osteoarthritic kneesArthritis & Rheumatism, 1990
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986