Anthropometric measurements can identify small for gestational age newborns: a cohort study in rural Tanzania
Open Access
- 23 April 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Pediatrics
- Vol. 19 (1), 120
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1500-0
Abstract
Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) is associated with increased neonatal mortality and morbidity. In low and middle income countries an accurate gestational age is often not known, making the identification of SGA newborns difficult. Measuring foot length, chest circumference and mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) of the newborn have previously been shown to be reasonable methods for detecting low birth weight (< 2500 g) and prematurity (gestational age < 37 weeks). The aim of this study was to investigate if the three anthropometric measurements could also correctly identify SGA newborns. In the current study from a rural area of northeastern Tanzania, 376 live newborns had foot length, chest circumference, and MUAC measured within 24 h of birth. Gestational age was estimated by transabdominal ultrasound in early pregnancy and SGA was diagnosed using a sex-specific weight reference chart previously developed in the study area. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for each of the anthropometric measurements and the area under the curve (AUC) compared. Operational cutoffs for foot length, chest circumference, and MUAC were defined while balancing as high as possible sensitivity and specificity for identifying SGA. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were then calculated. Of the 376 newborns, 68 (18.4%) were SGA. The AUC for detecting SGA was 0.78 for foot length, 0.88 for chest circumference, and 0.85 for MUAC. Operational cut-offs to detect SGA newborns were defined as ≤7.7 cm for foot length, ≤31.6 cm for chest circumference and ≤ 10.1 cm for MUAC. Foot length had 74% sensitivity, 69% specificity, PPV of 0.35 and NPV of 0.92 for identifying SGA. Chest circumference had 79% sensitivity, 81% specificity, PPV of 0.49 and NPV of 0.95 for identifying SGA. Finally, MUAC had 76% sensitivity, 77% specificity, PPV of 0.43 and NPV of 0.94 for identifying SGA. In a setting with limited availability of an accurate gestational age, all three methods had a high NPV and could be used to rule out the newborn as being SGA. Overall, chest circumference was the best method to identify SGA newborns, whereas foot length and MUAC had lower detection ability. Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02191683 ). Registered 2 July 2014.Keywords
Funding Information
- Danish Council for Strategic Research (1309-00003B)
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The assessment of gestational age: a comparison of different methods from a malaria pregnancy cohort in sub-Saharan AfricaBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2019
- Intrauterine growth restriction – part 2The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2016
- Foot length in newborns small for gestational ageTropical Doctor, 2015
- Foot Length, Chest Circumference, and Mid Upper Arm Circumference Are Good Predictors of Low Birth Weight and Prematurity in Ethnic Minority Newborns in Vietnam: A Hospital-Based Observational StudyPLOS ONE, 2015
- Anthropometric Measurements: Options for Identifying Low Birth Weight Newborns in Kumasi, GhanaPLOS ONE, 2014
- Measuring newborn foot length to identify small babies in need of extra care: a cross sectional hospital based study with community follow-up in TanzaniaBMC Public Health, 2010
- Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challengesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010
- Relationship between the surrogate anthropometric measures, foot length and chest circumference and birth weight among newborns of Sarlahi, NepalEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2006
- The Epidemiology of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An OverviewJournal of Nutrition, 2003
- Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5-18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US.Radiology, 1992