Foot Length, Chest Circumference, and Mid Upper Arm Circumference Are Good Predictors of Low Birth Weight and Prematurity in Ethnic Minority Newborns in Vietnam: A Hospital-Based Observational Study
Open Access
- 10 November 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 10 (11), e0142420
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142420
Abstract
The evaluation of tools to accurately identify low birth weight (LBW) and/or premature newborns in resource-limited countries is a research priority. We explored the use of foot length, chest circumference, and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) measured within 24 h as diagnostic tools for identifying newborns who are LBW, premature, or both; and compared measurements taken at birth with those taken at five days of age. An observational study was undertaken in Hoa Binh Province General Hospital, Vietnam, in ethnic minority newborns. Birth weight, foot length, chest circumference, and MUAC were measured within 24 h of birth and in a subset of 200, were repeated on day five of life. Gestational age was estimated using the New Ballard Score. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves and optimal cut-points (the point with the highest sensitivity and specificity where the sensitivity was at least 0.8) were calculated, for predicting prematurity, LBW, and both. Measurements within 24 h and at five days of life were compared. 485 newborns were recruited. Chest circumference and MUAC measured within 24 h of birth were found to be highly predictive of LBW (both yielding area under the curve [AUC] of 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96–0.99), and performed marginally better than foot length (AUC 0.94, 95%CI 0.92–0.96). The optimal cut-points for measurements within 24 h of birth were ≤7.4cm for foot length; ≤30.4cm for chest circumference; and ≤ 9.0cm for MUAC. There was statistical evidence that anthropometric measurements taken within 24 h of birth were higher than measurements on day five (p<0.02 for all anthropometric measurements) but the magnitude of these differences was small (at most 2mm). All measurements taken within 24 h of birth were good predictors of LBW, prematurity and both. Differences in measurements taken within 24 h and on day five were not clinically relevant. Further research will ensure that the application of these measures is reliable in community settings.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- UNICEF Report: enormous progress in child survival but greater focus on newborns urgently needed.Reproductive Health, 2014
- Preterm Birth: Now the Leading Cause of Child Death WorldwideScience Translational Medicine, 2014
- Anthropometric Measurements: Options for Identifying Low Birth Weight Newborns in Kumasi, GhanaPLOS ONE, 2014
- Neonatal Mortality Levels for 193 Countries in 2009 with Trends since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of Progress, Projections, and PrioritiesPLoS Medicine, 2011
- Meta-Analysis: Identification of Low Birthweight by Other Anthropometric Measurements at Birth in Developing CountriesJournal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Ethnic inequity in neonatal survival: a case‐referent study in northern VietnamActa Paediatrica, 2010
- Relationship between the surrogate anthropometric measures, foot length and chest circumference and birth weight among newborns of Sarlahi, NepalEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2006
- Anthropometric measurements in the detection of low birth weight infants in LagosNigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 2003
- Foot Length Measurement from Foot Print for Identifying a Newborn at RiskJournal of Tropical Pediatrics, 1988
- Foot length--a new and potentially useful measurement in the neonate.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1979