Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: A case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research
- 30 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Social Science & Medicine (1982)
- Vol. 70 (12), 1896-1903
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.031
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Aging (R01-AG029550)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the Public's Views in Research Ethics Controversies: Deliberative Democracy and Bioethics as Natural AlliesJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2009
- Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping reviewHealth Policy, 2009
- Informed consent in biobank research: A deliberative approach to the debateSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2009
- Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy developmentAustralia and New Zealand Health Policy, 2008
- Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political ScienceAnnual Review of Political Science, 2008
- Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: The role of citizens’ deliberationHealth Policy, 2008
- Proxy and Surrogate Consent in Geriatric Neuropsychiatric Research: Update and RecommendationsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2004
- DELIBERATIVEDEMOCRATICTHEORYAnnual Review of Political Science, 2003
- Views of Potential Subjects Toward Proposed Regulations for Clinical Research With Adults Unable to ConsentAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2002
- Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic CommentPhilosophy & Public Affairs, 2000