Assessing the Public's Views in Research Ethics Controversies: Deliberative Democracy and Bioethics as Natural Allies
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- Vol. 4 (4), 3-16
- https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2009.4.4.3
Abstract
In a liberal democracy, policy decisions regarding ethical controversies, including those in research ethics, should incorporate the opinions of its citizens. Eliciting informed and well-considered ethical opinions can be challenging. The issues may not be widely familiar and they may involve complex scientific, legal, historical, and ethical dimensions. Traditional surveys risk eliciting superficial and uninformed opinions that may be of dubious quality for policy formation. We argue that the theory and practice of deliberative democracy (DD) is especially useful in overcoming such inadequacies. We explain DD theory and practice, discuss the rationale for using DD methods in research ethics, and illustrate in depth the use of a DD method for a longstanding research ethics controversy involving research based on surrogate consent. The potential pitfalls of DD and the means of minimizing them as well as future research directions are also discussed.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping reviewHealth Policy, 2009
- Informed consent in biobank research: A deliberative approach to the debateSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2009
- Older Adults’ Attitudes Toward Enrollment of Non-competent Subjects Participating in Alzheimer’s ResearchAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2009
- Surrogate consent for dementia researchNeurology, 2009
- Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy developmentAustralia and New Zealand Health Policy, 2008
- Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: The role of citizens’ deliberationHealth Policy, 2008
- Group Polarization and 12 Angry MenNegotiation Journal, 2007
- Community consultation in emergency research*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Views of Potential Subjects Toward Proposed Regulations for Clinical Research With Adults Unable to ConsentAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2002
- Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in BritainBritish Journal of Political Science, 2002